Saturday, February 22, 2020

A Briefer on The Right to Protest and Police Powers Assignment

A Briefer on The Right to Protest and Police Powers - Assignment Example The paper tells that pertinent legal provision that applies to the right to public protest is in Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which states as follows: â€Å"Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.† The second paragraph qualifies the scope of the freedom of peaceful assembly and the freedom of association, by laying down the limitations to this right and reiterating the power of agents of the state, such as the police and armed forces, to impose lawful restrictions. The restrictions to this right are as follows: (1) interests of national security or public safety, (2) for the prevention of disorder or crime, (3) for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Article 11 should be seen alongside the right guaranteed in Article 10 of the ECHR, on which is enshrined the right of â€Å"freedom of opinion† which â€Å"shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.† It is important to note that these provisions carry both a negative and positive obligation for the state: the negative obligation is the obligation not to interfere in the exercise of the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of opinion, and the positive obligation is to take positive measures towards the free and meaningful exercise of these rights. 3. The operative word in the provision would be the word â€Å"peaceful† and there has been some debate over whether or not a particular form of protest may

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Managerial Economics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Managerial Economics - Assignment Example The firm would be worse off, if it produced in the short run because the total loss that the firm will incur in this case is 380 AED (120-500). It is prudent if the firm shuts down and saves 200 AED rather than losing 380 AED in the short run. At the point where the firm produces 30 units and sells each unit at 4 AED, MRC (marginal revenue cost) is less than AVC (average variable cost). Assuming that Coke has already attained the monopoly status such that Coke is a monopolist, Coke actively engages itself in price discrimination because it has price setting power (Carbaugh). Given that there is a difference in price elasticity of demand for Coke in various regions, the company varies its price and extracts consumer surplus, which leads to additional revenue and profit. Coke discriminates on price by selling its product to distributors at different prices. For instance, the price of the same can of Coke in Seattle is higher than it is in Sidney. Separately, consumers from the UK purchase Coke at a higher price, compared to consumers from other countries within the continent. When Coke is able to separate the markets, it makes profits denoted by area MC, P, X, Y + MC1, P1, X1, Y1. The price charged when Coke separates the market will be P while output Q will be produced in a relatively elastic sub-market. Coke will charge a lower price in a relatively inelastic sub-m arket (P1). When duopolists, Etisalat and Du form a cartel between themselves, the firms would want to maximize their joint profits by producing a smaller quantity and charging higher prices. The optimal total industrial output selected by Etisalat and Du would be the monopoly quantity (Agarwala). It would be agreed that Etisalat and Du contribute in production of the agreed quantity and then share the profit between them equally. Consequently, the price and output in the market will be affected in that the